Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSanti, Paul M. (Paul Michael), 1964-
dc.contributor.authorPratt, Daniel R.
dc.date.accessioned2007-01-03T06:07:13Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-09T08:56:45Z
dc.date.available2007-01-03T06:07:13Z
dc.date.available2022-02-09T08:56:45Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.date.submitted2014
dc.identifierT 7444
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11124/371
dc.description2014 Spring.
dc.descriptionIncludes illustrations (some color), color maps.
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 103-108).
dc.description.abstractThis thesis presents the Colorado Landslide Hazard Rating System (CLHRS), a framework for quantifying landslide risk as it applies to highways in the state of Colorado. A preliminary version of the CLHRS was developed based on a review of the current body of technical literature regarding the factors that contribute to landslide hazard, consequence, and risk. The preliminary CLHRS consisted of 11 Hazard Factors and 8 Consequence Factors that were used to calculate an overall risk score. The preliminary CLHRS was used to evaluate 69 landslides distributed throughout western Colorado. The resulting scoring distributions were subjected to a suite of statistical analyses in order to facilitate data screening and identify the factors that possessed the greatest statistical merit. Descriptive statistics were used to establish severity category breaks for hazard, consequence, and risk. Evaluation of the distribution of scores for each factor as well as correlation analysis, ordinal logistic regression, and stepwise regression were used to eliminate factors that lacked sufficient predictive power. Cluster analysis was applied as a secondary method for establishing boundaries on severity categories and compared to the descriptive statistics method. The data screening steps allowed for the creation of a final functional version of the CLHRS consisting of 6 Hazard Factors: geology, vegetative cover, slope aspect, surface water influence, failure frequency, and slope angle, and 6 Consequence Factors: depth to slide plane, length of highway affected, average daily traffic, detour options, worst-case scenario detour time, and annual maintenance cost. Linear regressions comparing the 19 parameter system to the 12 parameter system indicate that consistent patterns in total score distributions are maintained. Furthermore, comparisons of the landslides with the highest risk scores to their respective case studies further corroborate the findings of this research.
dc.format.mediumborn digital
dc.format.mediummasters theses
dc.languageEnglish
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherColorado School of Mines. Arthur Lakes Library
dc.relation.ispartof2010-2019 - Mines Theses & Dissertations
dc.rightsCopyright of the original work is retained by the author.
dc.subjectstatistics
dc.subjectrisk assessment
dc.subjecthazard
dc.subjectrating system
dc.subjectlandslides
dc.subject.lcshLandslide hazard analysis -- Colorado
dc.subject.lcshLandslides -- Risk assessment -- Colorado
dc.subject.lcshRoads -- Colorado
dc.subject.lcshHazard mitigation -- Colorado
dc.subject.lcshCorrelation (Statistics)
dc.titleLandslide hazard rating system for Colorado highways, A
dc.typeText
dc.contributor.committeememberHiggins, Jerry D.
dc.contributor.committeememberZhou, Wendy
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science (M.S.)
thesis.degree.levelMasters
thesis.degree.disciplineGeology and Geological Engineering
thesis.degree.grantorColorado School of Mines


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Pratt_mines_0052N_10408.pdf
Size:
3.497Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Thesis
Thumbnail
Name:
Pratt_mines_0052N_316.zip
Size:
237.2Kb
Format:
Unknown
Description:
Data

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record