• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Theses & Dissertations
    • 2019 - Mines Theses & Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Theses & Dissertations
    • 2019 - Mines Theses & Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Mines RepositoryCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Mines Links

    Arthur Lakes LibraryColorado School of Mines

    Statistics

    Display Statistics

    Impact of reservoir heterogeneity on inventory verification in natural gas underground storage reservoirs subject to water drive

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Mozelewski_mines_0052N_11840.pdf
    Size:
    9.227Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Mozelewski, Joseph
    Advisor
    Ozkan, E.
    Yin, Xiaolong
    Date issued
    2019
    Keywords
    gas storage
    natural gas underground storage
    simulation
    inventory verification
    aquifer
    reservoir heterogeneity
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/11124/173983
    Abstract
    This thesis demonstrates how the current method used for inventory verification in natural gas underground storage fields subject to water drive can be impacted by reservoir heterogeneity. The current method of performing inventory verification assumes average (homogeneous) reservoir properties and a relatively consistent operation of the field comprising of similar injection/withdrawal volumes from year to year (Tek 1996). Throughout the text, this method will be referred to as Tek’s method. For high quality reservoirs (high permeability/porosity), the assumptions made in Tek’s method may hold true, but at higher levels of reservoir heterogeneity, these assumptions may lead to large errors in the calculated inventory, resulting in an incorrect understanding of how the storage horizon and aquifer interact. This misunderstanding could lead to large differences between how the field/reservoir is expected to perform and how it actually performs. These differences could be seen in various forms such as a loss in deliverability, increase in water production, change in the field’s pressure-content (hysteresis) plot, reduction in field peak rate, etc. The degree of difference between the field’s anticipated performance and the actual performance is directly related to the number and location of the observation wells used to perform the inventory verification. Tek’s method of inventory verification incorporates data from two observation wells, one being completed in the storage horizon to provide gas pressure, and the other being completed in the water leg to provide pressure data on the aquifer. With only two observation wells being used in the inventory verification calculations, one or both wells may be impacted by the heterogeneity of the reservoir. Many storage fields have additional observation wells that could be incorporated into the inventory verification analysis to help alleviate the error caused from the underlying assumptions. However, the current trend in the underground gas storage (UGS) industry, due to regulatory emphasis on well bore integrity, is to plug and abandon these older observation wells. The results from this study will demonstrate the importance of using additional observation well data for inventory verification, providing storage operators evidence to support maintaining their observation wells instead of plugging them. The methodology of this study began with a conceptual 2D homogeneous gas/water model. From the homogeneous model, various degrees of reservoir heterogeneity were applied. The pressure results produced from the model were used in Tek’s method for calculating the gas inventory. The error between the calculated inventory and the simulation model inventory was determined for each case. A maximum allowable error was defined enabling the establishment of an applicable window of reservoir heterogeneity for inventory verification using Tek’s method. Finally, additional observation wells were added to the inventory verification methodology to determine if the error could be reduced. The major findings of this study can be grouped into two categories; first, the impact that reservoir heterogeneity has on the calculated inventory and in turn on the percent-error, and second, the impact of incorporating additional observation wells into the equations used to calculate inventory has on the percent-error. For the impact of reservoir heterogeneity, the results demonstrate two findings. The first finding is that, as the degree of heterogeneity increases throughout the reservoir, the percent-error in the calculated inventory increases as well. The second finding demonstrates how reservoir heterogeneity between the observation well and the adjacent injection/withdrawal wells increases the percent-error in the calculated inventory. With the incorporation of additional observation wells, the results show that in cases of high reservoir heterogeneity, using data from additional observation wells can help to reduce the percent-error. For most cases, two additional observation wells were able to decrease the percent-error to an acceptable level. For the cases with the highest degree of heterogeneity and percent-error, more observation wells were required to reduce the error to an acceptable level.
    Rights
    Copyright of the original work is retained by the author.
    Collections
    2019 - Mines Theses & Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.