• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Theses & Dissertations
    • 2019 - Mines Theses & Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Theses & Dissertations
    • 2019 - Mines Theses & Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Mines RepositoryCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Mines Links

    Arthur Lakes LibraryColorado School of Mines

    Statistics

    Display Statistics

    Landslide susceptibility mapping using a logistic regression approach: a case study in Colorado Springs, El Paso County, Colorado

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Southerland_mines_0052N_11822.pdf
    Size:
    4.717Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Southerland, Lauren
    Advisor
    Zhou, Wendy
    Date issued
    2019
    Keywords
    GIS
    logistic regression
    landslide susceptibility
    Colorado Springs
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/11124/173292
    Abstract
    A landslide is defined as a mass-wasting process of soil, rock or debris that moves downslope (U.S. Geological Survey, 2004). Landslides can occur on any terrain if the geomorphic, geological, and hydrological conditions are right. Landslides can cause significant property damage and even fatalities. Located in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains, Colorado Springs has proved to be highly susceptible to landslides. In summer 2015, approximately 200 homes were destroyed due to natural hazards including landslides in the area (FEMA, 2015). Efforts to quantify accuracy of landslide susceptibility maps by failure mechanism in Colorado Springs have been limited, thus warranting this study. The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a geology-slope logistic regression (logit) model used to create landslide susceptibility maps. The inputs of the geology-slope logit model include only more readily available geology and topography data. To assess the effectiveness of this geology-slope logit model, a borehole-slope logit model that includes cohesion, friction angle, unit weight, groundwater depths, and topography was also developed. The two models were applied to study landslide susceptibility in a six square mile area of southwestern Colorado Springs. The results of both models were compared and evaluated for their accuracy by using a Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve method. The landslide susceptibility maps are specific to failure mechanisms present in the study area including circular failures within the colluvium deposits, circular failures within the weathered shale and planar failures within the weathered shale. The landslide susceptibility maps were produced for each failure mechanism present in the study area. The results show that the geology-slope model yields an ROC ranging from 53% to 62%, and the borehole-slope model yields an ROC ranging from 52% to 79%. The borehole-slope model outperformed the geology-slope model for circular failures in the colluvium deposits and planar failures within the weathered shale. The geology-slope model had a more successful ROC curve accuracy than the borehole-slope model for circular failures within the weathered shale. In addition, the results indicate that geology was the significant input in the geology-slope model, while soil strength parameters were the significant input for the borehole-slope model. In summary, the logit models developed in this study were used to create failure-mechanism-specific landslide susceptibility maps, which have not been done in previous studies for the Colorado Springs area. The landslide susceptibility maps produced in this study provide insights for prioritizing areas of additional field investigation. The geology-slope model can be easily and rapidly applied to other study areas since both geologic and topographic information are readily available.
    Rights
    Copyright of the original work is retained by the author.
    Collections
    2019 - Mines Theses & Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.