• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Theses & Dissertations
    • 2018 - Mines Theses & Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Theses & Dissertations
    • 2018 - Mines Theses & Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Mines RepositoryCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Mines Links

    Arthur Lakes LibraryColorado School of Mines

    Statistics

    Display Statistics

    Multiple compartment anaerobic bioreactors for the generation of energy: exploring energy-positive wastewater treatment

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Pfluger_mines_0052E_11473.pdf
    Size:
    5.634Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Pfluger, Andrew Ross
    Advisor
    Munakata Marr, Junko
    Figueroa, Linda A.
    Date issued
    2018
    Keywords
    anaerobic microbiology
    renewable energy
    wastewater treatment
    lifecycle analysis
    anaerobic baffled bioreactor
    sustainable
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/11124/172267
    Abstract
    Wastewater contains resources such as energy, clean water, and nutrients. Under the current wastewater treatment paradigm (i.e., activated sludge), resources are consumed rather than recovered. Anaerobic bioreactors are a potentially viable alternative to traditional aerobic wastewater treatment for several reasons, to include their ability to generate methane-rich biogas while simultaneously reducing volumes of waste sludge and decreasing waste disposal burden. Multiple-compartment anaerobic bioreactors, such as the anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR), are particularly attractive due to the reactor’s low complexity and its ability to generate methane with little to no energy input. Despite these advantages, pilot-scale demonstrations of ABRs, or variations of the ABR, operated under colder wastewater temperatures (11 – 24 degrees C) are extremely limited. Prior to widespread implementation, ABRs treating domestic wastewater require additional pilot-scale demonstration, study of the lifecycle impacts relative to conventional wastewater treatment technologies, and a more complete understanding of the microbial community dynamics for modeling and performance prediction. To address these research needs, this dissertation examines the performance of two low-complexity pilot-scale multiple-compartment anaerobic bioreactors in three different areas: (1) characterizing bioreactor performance over varying temperatures for organic removal, suspended solids removal, and methane generation; (2) modeling lifecycle impacts and energy generating potential relative to conventional wastewater treatment approaches; and (3) characterizing methanogenic community structure over time and space within both bioreactor systems. The pilot-scale anaerobic bioreactors characterized in this study were: (1) an existing four-compartment ABR located at the Plum Creek Water Reclamation Authority in Castle Rock, CO, and (2) a three-compartment ABR coupled with an anaerobic fixed film reactor (AFFR), which was constructed at the Mines Park Wastewater Test Bed. Modeling methods include full treatment train modeling in BioWin 5.2, environmental impact modeling in SimaPro (version 8.0.3.14), lifecycle cost modeling in CAPDETWorks (version 2.5, Hydromantis, Inc.), and uncertainty modeling (Monte Carlo simulation) in Oracle Crystal Ball. Microbial community structure was examined using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Key findings of this study are numerous, and include: (1) both ABRs studied remove higher levels of organics and suspended solids relative to conventional primary treatment while generating near stoichiometric volumes of methane; (2) ABRs have high chemical energy conversion efficiencies relative to other wastewater treatment reactors, recovering 52% of the chemical energy available in the influent wastewater organics; (3) modeling suggests that energy generated by ABRs coupled with combined heat and power (CHP) with heat recovery is sufficient to power many typical conventional activated sludge systems; (4) lifecycle environmental impacts for treatment trains including ABRs are lower in most impact categories (e.g., fossil fuel emissions, acidification, etc.), but dissolved methane capture is required to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance potential energy generation; (5) lifecycle costs and net energy balances for modeled configurations with ABRs are lower relative to conventional treatment configurations; and (6) both ABRs developed similar methanogen-rich microbial communities dominated by Methanosaeta, an acetate-utilizing methanogen. Additional study is needed in several areas, to include the treatment of residual contaminants in the effluent of ABRs and long-term characterization of the microbial community structure for accurate modeling. However, this study concludes that multiple-compartment anaerobic bioreactors, such as the ABR, are a viable energy-generating alternative to conventional primary treatment. Full-scale demonstrations should be implemented near-term.
    Rights
    Copyright of the original work is retained by the author.
    Collections
    2018 - Mines Theses & Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.