• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Theses & Dissertations
    • 2017 - Mines Theses & Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Theses & Dissertations
    • 2017 - Mines Theses & Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Mines RepositoryCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Mines Links

    Arthur Lakes LibraryColorado School of Mines

    Statistics

    Display Statistics

    Selecting an optimal surfactant for use in EOR: an experimental study

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Khaleel_mines_0052N_11275.pdf
    Size:
    1.335Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Khaleel, Omar T.
    Advisor
    Abass, Hazim H.
    Alameri, Waleed
    Date issued
    2017
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/11124/171019
    Abstract
    The objective of this thesis is to choose an optimum surfactant for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in carbonate formations by studying the phase behavior, interfacial tension (IFT) and wettability alteration. The cost of surfactant is critical; thus, I have focused on low-cost commercial surfactants. An estimated cost of a typical one percent surfactant solution in one barrel of injected water is $8.75. Thus, when a project involves injecting 100,000 barrels per day of one percent surfactant solution, the daily cost of surfactant is $875,000. Thus, in one year, the surfactant cost is about $320,000,000. I chose three types of surfactants: two anionic surfactants, Enordet 0332 and 0342 olefin sulfonates, from Shell; one non-ionic surfactant, Neodol 91-8 ethoxylated alcohol, also from Shell and a bio-surfactant, Rhamnolipid, from AGAE technologies. In the first part of my study, I studied the phase behavior of the above-mentioned surfactants to determine the optimum salinity for each surfactant. Specifically, I prepared ten one-percent surfactant solutions with salinities ranging from zero to 90,000 NaCl. I mixed each surfactant solution with oil in 1:1 ratio and allowed the mixture to equilibrate for three weeks. The majority of the surfactant-oil systems exhibited Winsor type III microemulsion at around 80,000-ppm salinity. Therefore, I carried out all tests at this salinity. In the second part of my study, I evaluated the effect of each surfactant on IFT reduction and wettability alteration. I mixed four one-percent surfactant in 80,000-ppm NaCl brine with the same volume of oil, and allowed three weeks for the mixture to reach equilibrium. IFTs were measured for the equilibrated mixtures at 25°C, 50°C, and 75°C using a spinning drop tensiometer. The anionic surfactant Enordet 0342 reached the lowest IFT compared with the other surfactants studied. In the third part of my study, I conducted four wettability studies on several carbonate core discs. I aged the cores in oil for five weeks at 2000 psi and 195°F. Then, I used the equilibrated surfactant-brine solution and oil to measure contact angle using the drop shape analyzer (DSA) at the same temperatures used for the IFT measurement. Three of the four surfactants caused wettability alterations, except the bio-surfactant that demonstrated no wettability alterations. I have concluded the following results from this study: 1. The Winsor type III microemulsion (that is, existence of a three-phase microemulsion) formed in all of the four mixtures; however, the non-ionic surfactant yielded the largest Winsor type III microemulsion volume. 2. The anionic surfactant, Enordet 0342, exhibited the lowest IFT of 0.000048 dyne/cm while the non-ionic surfactant exhibited an IFT of 0.0014 dyne/cm. The anionic surfactant Enordet 0332 and the biosurfactant exhibited IFT about 0.05 dyne/cm. 3. Contact angle measurements indicated that both anionic surfactants altered the rock wettability to water-wet conditions the most, while the non-ionic surfactant altered wettability to the water-wet condition to a lesser level. 4. The most optimal surfactant for the tested carbonate samples, at 80,000-ppm NaCl and 75°C, was the non-ionic surfactant.
    Rights
    Copyright of the original work is retained by the author.
    Collections
    2017 - Mines Theses & Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.