• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Theses & Dissertations
    • 2016 - Mines Theses & Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Theses & Dissertations
    • 2016 - Mines Theses & Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of Mines RepositoryCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Mines Links

    Arthur Lakes LibraryColorado School of Mines

    Statistics

    Display Statistics

    Integrated analysis of Waulsortian-type bioherms of the Lodgepole Formation: Stark County, North Dakota and Bridger Range, Montana

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Graham_mines_0052N_11012.pdf
    Size:
    22.25Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Graham, Andrew J.
    Advisor
    Sonnenberg, Stephen A.
    Date issued
    2016
    Keywords
    bioherms
    Bridger Range
    lodgepole
    mounds
    Stark County
    Waulsortian
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    https://hdl.handle.net/11124/170229
    Abstract
    Significant amounts of hydrocarbons have been produced in Stark County, North Dakota from Mississippian-aged carbonate mounds or bioherms within the Lodgepole Formation. These carbonate mounds have been compared and contrasted to Waulsortian mounds, which are found in the Lower Carboniferous (Tournaisian-Visean) throughout the northern hemisphere (Wilson 1975). While Waulsortian or Waulsortian-type mounds are characterized by their mud-rich and massive nature, the mounds in Stark County are noticeably different. Initial petrographic study of the Patterson #1-24 well (NESE Sec. 24 T. 139N R. 97W) in Stark County has shown that major constituents of the mounds include crinoids, brachiopods, and ostracods among other minor constituents. Porosity is minimal and is generally limited to intergranular and intragranular pore types. Outcrops of these mounds have been identified in two different mountain ranges in Montana. Two mounds are present in Swimming Woman Canyon of the Big Snowy Mountains in central Montana. Up to five mounds are located at two different locations within the Bridger Range of southwestern Montana. Field work was done on two mounds that had been un-studied due to their remoteness at the southernmost tip of the Bridger Range Mountains. Data collected included dimensions of mounds, stratigraphic sections, facies associations, and systematic sampling both laterally and vertically. Data collected from this outcrop was used to compare and contrast observations made previously on outcrops that had been studied in great detail. In addition, these outcrop data were used to compare the Montana outcrop mounds to those that are producing significant amounts of hydrocarbons from the subsurface in Stark County, North Dakota. Rocks from both the subsurface and outcrops were studied extensively (via core and hand samples) followed by petrographic thin section analysis. For each thin section acquired, grains present, texture, cavity structures, cements, replacements, and porosity were noted. Of particular importance was developing a diagenetic history of these mounds. As such, the variety of cements present were noted and studied. Furthermore, cathodoluminescence microscopy was used to aid in distinguishing the different episodes of cementation that comprise the paragenetic history of these mounds. A total of five distinct facies were observed at the Bridger Range outcrops. They are (1) a crinoid and fenestrate bryozoan mottle wackestone basal biostrome facies; (2) a skeletal wackestone to mud-rich packstone to grainstone to marine cemented boundstone inner core facies; (3) a crinoidal and bryozoan to mud-rich packstone to grainstone outer core facies; (4) a bryozoan and crinoidal mud-rich packstone to grainstone; and (5) an argillaceous mudstone to skeletal wackestone of the regional Lodgepole facies. Comparing the outcropping mounds to the subsurface mounds, the previously studied mounds at Sacagawea Peak and Saddle Peak are dwarfed by the large mound complexes in Stark County. This difference in size is attributed to a smaller initial area upon which the Bridger Range mounds nucleated followed by a much earlier cessation of mound development (i.e., earlier drowning event) compared to the Stark County mounds. The locations of mounds found in the subsurface coincide with areas that have abnormally thick Upper Bakken Shale. These areas of thick Upper Bakken Shale have been attributed to two-stage dissolution of the underlying Prairie salt, which ultimately may have allowed for the development of the subsurface Lodgepole mounds. Initial dissolution resulted in a paleotopographic low, where additional Upper Bakken Shale was deposited. The second stage of dissolution resulted in a paleotopographic high of the Upper Bakken Shale, forming an ideal site for nucleation of the Lodgepole carbonate mounds. Based on petrographic studies, the Bridger Range outcropping mounds and the Stark County subsurface mounds were cemented early with pseudo-peloidal, radial-fibrous, and equant calcite cements. These cements allowed for minimal compaction and preservation of the mound core facies.
    Rights
    Copyright of the original work is retained by the author.
    Collections
    2016 - Mines Theses & Dissertations

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.